tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5739125502680107097.post8170677492077479769..comments2023-12-20T03:53:19.857-05:00Comments on Jost on Justice: In Union Case, Counting to Five to Overrule Precedent<b>Kenneth Jost</b>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08130278447396616546noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5739125502680107097.post-53633742439068033642016-01-20T13:58:55.911-05:002016-01-20T13:58:55.911-05:00Jost - overrule Conservative precedent for Liberal...Jost - overrule Conservative precedent for Liberal result = good law. Overrule Liberal precedent for Conservative result = bad law. Sad, indeed.rhj1954https://www.blogger.com/profile/08657785598210350350noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5739125502680107097.post-25170312430289676922016-01-19T20:01:14.242-05:002016-01-19T20:01:14.242-05:00You barely attempt to distinguish this case from O...You barely attempt to distinguish this case from Obergfell or Hurst; so they are good changes in the law, but this would be bad, because you prefer one outcome but not the other? Okay Mr. Ipse Dixit. But your approval of Obergfell, but criticizing Carvin for stating that the deprival of a fundamental right (this time, a right actually found in the constitution) is sufficient to overcome stare HoyaSaxanoreply@blogger.com